> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.metal.so/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
# Post-Meeting Analysis
> A structured analysis of every investor call — what worked, what didn't, and what to do differently next time.
Most founders come out of investor calls with a rough sense of how it went — good energy, tough questions, and some early interest. That assessment is almost always directionally right, but tactically unhelpful.
Meeting Intelligence replaces that gut read with a structured analysis. After every investor call, the platform produces a breakdown of what happened across three dimensions — with specific evidence from the transcript: what key areas came up, how the messaging landed, and what to change.
Navigate to **Process → Meeting Intelligence → Completed** to access the view.
***
## The Three Dimensions
The post-meeting analysis assigns a specific score across three broad dimensions:
How clear was the overall communication and the Company's vision and progress?
How well structured was the call, the strategy or key points in the narrative?
How did the investor rank in terms of conviction (against large data sets)?
***
## Reading the Analysis
The scores are entry points. The real coaching lies inside the call cards. The analysis is structured into clearly labeled sections with a dynamic table of contents. Clicking any section title scrolls directly to it. Sections typically include:
1. **Investor Fit and Concerns** — How well did this investor map to our round, and what surfaced as friction or hesitation
2. **Founder Performance** — Where the narrative broke down or could be improved
3. **Story and Narrative** — How the pitch landed, where it was precise, and where it was too vague
4. **Product and Market** — How the investor engaged with your category and traction claims
5. **Next Steps** — Concrete follow-up actions and adjustments to make before subsequent calls
Each of the above sections contains highlights of what worked, risks or objections raised, and specific actionable suggestions — such as bringing data earlier, sharpening a particular answer, or restructuring the opening.
For most founders, including ones that have raised large rounds before, the analysis typically reveals insights or observations from the call that they wouldn't have learned themselves.
***
## Discuss with Richard
Each call analysis includes a **Discuss with Richard** option in the Analysis tab. Clicking on this initiates a conversation with AI Richard, equipped with the full transcript and analysis, making it a working session rather than a report to read and set aside.
Founders commonly work with Richard AI to:
1. **Draft a follow-up** — not a generic check-in, but a message informed by what the investor specifically flagged during the call
2. **Role play a talking point** **that scored low** — ask Richard to push back the way the investor did so you can sharpen the answer before the next call
3. **Interpret conviction signals** — if the investor asked sharp diligence questions, Richard can help you read whether that signals serious interest or routine screening
4. **Define next steps** — get structured recommendations on what to do and how to adjust your approach for the next conversation with this investor
Ask specific questions. *"Should I follow up?"* is less useful than *"Draft a follow-up email that addresses their concern about go-to-market timing."* Richard has full context on the call, the investor's profile, and where the relationship sits in your pipeline.
***